Volume 20, Issue 2 (10-2023)                   J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023, 20(2): 30-33 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghaderi R, Mahmoodi-Shan G R, Taziki M H, Behnampour N. Association between satisfaction with hearing aid use and quality of life among elderly individuals with hearing loss. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2023; 20 (2) :30-33
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1289-en.html
1- Geriatric Nursing student, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Nursing Research Center, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , Mahmoodigh@yahoo.com
3- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract:   (1530 Views)
Background: Hearing loss is a common condition during the aging process. Improving hearing loss through hearing aids may impact satisfaction and the quality of life of elderly individuals. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the association between Hearing Aid Use Satisfaction (HAUS) and the quality of life among the elderly with hearing loss in Gorgan, Iran.
Methods: This study is a cross-sectional investigation conducted in 2019 at the health insurance office in Gorgan, Iran. The study included elderly individuals aged over 60 who were fitted with hearing aids. Sixty subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were conveniently selected. The assessment tools included a demographics checklist, the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) scale, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Data analysis was performed using SPSS-18 and involved the Chi-squared test, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman correlation coefficient. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered.
Results: The participants' mean age was 76.85±8.16, falling within the age range of 75-89. The average satisfaction score for the use of the HAUS was 63.90±11.07. A significant statistical association was observed between HAUS and economic status (P=0.03), the type of hearing aid used (P=0.024), and the level of daily hearing aid usage (P=0.0001). With an increase in the number of hours of hearing aid use, the mean satisfaction score also showed an increase. The mean score for the quality of life among the elderly individuals was 32.77±2.02, and no correlation was observed between satisfaction with HA use and quality of life (r=0.068, P=0.511).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that hearing aid devices can enhance the satisfaction and quality of life of elderly individuals, thereby increasing their engagement in daily activities.

 
Full-Text [PDF 430 kb]   (603 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (315 Views)  
Type of study: Original Article | Subject: Nursing

References
1. Kozlowski L, Ribas A, Almeida G, Luz I. Satisfaction of Elderly Hearing Aid Users Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;21(1):92-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Cunningham LL, Tucci DL. Hearing Loss in Adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2465-73. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Turton L, Souza P, Thibodeau L, Hickson L, Gifford R, Bird J, et al. Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss. Semin Hear. 2020;41(3):141-246. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Kim S, Park JM, Han JS, Seo JH, DHan K, Joo YH, et al. Age-related hearing loss in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243001. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Davis A, McMahon CM, Pichora-Fuller KM, Russ S, Lin F, Olusanya BO, et al. Aging and hearing health: the life-course approach. Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl_2):S256-67. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Kim Gy, Cho YS, Byun HM, Seol HY, Lim J, Park JG, et al. Factors Influencing Hearing Aid Satisfaction in South Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2022;63(6):570-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Picou EM. Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction Results from the MarkeTrak 2022 Survey: Importance of Features and Hearing Care Professionals. Semin Hear. 2022;43(4):301-16. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Karaca A, Durna Z. Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):535-45. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. EM Picou. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) Survey Results Demonstrate High Satisfaction with and Benefits from Hearing Aids. Semin Hear. 2020;41(1):21-36. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Haraldstad K, Wahl A, Andenæs R, Andersen JR, Andersen MH, Beisland E, et al. A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(10):2641-50. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Pouyandeh MH, Hoseinabadi R. Factors Influencing the Hearing Aids Use and Satisfaction: A Review Study. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2019;13(3):137-46. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. McMahon CM, Mosley CL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Davis AC, Baylor CR, Yorkston KM, et al. Older adults' perceptions of current and future hearing healthcare services in Australia, England, US and Canada. Public Health Res Pract. 2021;31(5):3152128. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Khiavi FF, Bayat A, Dashti R, Sameni SJ. Hearing aid-related satisfaction based on type and degree of hearing loss in elderly. Audiology. 2015;23(6):114-22. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, Omidvari S. The Iranian Version of 12- item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):341. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Dashti R, Faraji-Khiavi F, Sameni SJ, Bayat A. Satisfaction with Hearing Aids among Aged Patients with Different Degrees of Hearing Loss and Length of Daily Use. J Audiol Otol. 2015;19(1):14-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. McPherson B. Self-Reported Benefit and Satisfaction with a Beamforming Body-Worn Hearing Aid for Elderly Adults. Int J Otolaryngol. 2018;2018:1-14. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Kateifidis N, Sarafis P, Malliarou M, Tsounis A, Bamidis P, Niakas D. Quality of Life and Satisfaction among Patients Who Use Hearing Aids. Glob J Health Sci. 2017;9(6):177. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Romanet P, Guy M, Allaert FA. Clinical study on the efficacy, acceptance, and safety of hearing aids in patients with mild to moderate presbyacusis. Panminerva Med. 2018;60(3):92-100. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Hussenoeder FS, Jentzsch D, Matschinger H, Hinz A, Kilian R, Heller SR, et al. Depression and quality of life in old age: a closer look. Eur J Ageing. 2020;18(1):75-83. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb