Volume 19, Issue 2 (9-2022)                   J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2022, 19(2): 56-58 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseinzadeh Younesi E, Sabzi Z, Khandashpour M, Windisch W, Teymouri Yeganeh L, Kolagari S. Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure; A Protocol for Mixed Methods Study. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2022; 19 (2) :56-58
URL: http://nmj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1296-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, Phd Condidate in Nursing Education, Golestan University of Medical sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
2- Phd of Nursing, Assistant Professor, Nursing Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Science, Gorgan, Iran.
3- Department of Internal Medicine, Golestan University of Medical sciences, Shahid Sayad Shirazi Hospital, Gorgan, Iran
4- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, University of Witten/Herdecke.
5- Graduated in Mathematical Statistics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
6- Phd of Nursing, Associate Professor, Nursing Research Center , Golestan University of Medical Science, Gorgan, Iran , kolagari4@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1603 Views)

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) refers to perceived physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being. The purpose of this study is to evaluate HRQOL in patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF).
Methods: The present mixed methods study is conducted since 2020 by simultaneous implementation of quantitative and qualitative phases. The quantitative phase is cross-sectional research to deter
mine HRQOL in patients with CRF. In this phase, 171 patients will be selected based on the inclusion criteria from the internal medicine, respiratory, and neurology wards of hospitals affiliated with the Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Gorgan, Iran). The stratified sampling method is applied by calculating the bed occupancy rate. To collect data in this phase, the Persian version of the HRQOL questionnaire will be used for patients with CRF. In addition, the questionnaire will be translated and evaluated in terms of psychometric properties. Data obtained from the quantitative phase are analyzed by descriptive statistics using SPSS 16 software. Simultaneously with the quantitative phase, the researcher will achieve an understanding of HRQOL in the patients by using the contractual content analysis method in the qualitative phase. In this phase, the subjects will be selected via Purposeful sampling.  Data are collected through semi-structured interviews and sampling will continue until reaching data saturation. Data analysis is done by the Graneheim and Lundman method. In this regard, after extracting and categorizing the codes, subclasses and classes will be formed. Finally, the findings of the quantitative and qualitative phases will be compared and integrated for discussion and interpretation of the data.
Conclusion: Evaluation of HRQOL by implementing combined qualitative and quantitative approaches can provide a complete picture of this concept in patients with CRF. Moreover, the results of such studies can help predict outcomes and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.

Full-Text [PDF 468 kb]   (600 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (210 Views)  
perspective: Original Article | Subject: Nursing

References
1. Boer A, Geuskens GA, Bültmann U, Boot CR, Wind H, Koppes LL, et al. Employment status transitions in employees with and without chronic disease in the Netherlands. 2018;63(6):713-22. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Siddharthan T, Grigsby M, Morgan B, Kalyesubula R, Wise RA, Kirenga B, et al. Prevalence of chronic respiratory disease in urban and rural Uganda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2019;97(5):318. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3. Pishgar E, Fanni Z, Tavakkolinia J, Mohammadi A, Kiani B, Bergquist R. Mortality rates due to respiratory tract diseases in Tehran, Iran during 2008-2018: a spatiotemporal, cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1-12. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Massierer D, Alsowayan W, Lima VP, Bourbeau J, Janaudis-Ferreira T. Prognostic value of simple measures of physical function and muscle strength in COPD: a systematic review. Respiratory medicine. 2020;161:105856. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Jang SM, Kim KU, Na HJ, Song SE, Lee SH, Lee H, et al. Depression is a major determinant of both disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life in people with severe COPD. Chronic respiratory disease. 2018;16:1479972318775422. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Oga T, Windisch W, Handa T, Hirai T, Chin K. Health-related quality of life measurement in patients with chronic respiratory failure. Respiratory investigation. 2018;56(3):214-21. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(7):645-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Masroor D, Rafii F, Fadaeeaghdam N, Hoseini F. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2012;25.(76) [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
9. Ghafari G, Karimi A, Nozari H, Iran Ri. Trend study of quality of life in Iran. Quarterly of Social Studies. 2013;1(3):107-34. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
10. Valko L, Baglyas S, Kunos L, Terray-Horvath A, Lorx A, Gal J, et al. Validation of the Hungarian version of the SRI Questionnaire. BMC pulmonary medicine. 2020;20(1):1-9. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in health. 2005;8(2):94-104. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Statistical methods and analyses in health and biosciences a research methodological approach. Tehran: Jahade Daneshgahi Publications. 2011;395. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
13. Sharif Nia S, Sharif SP, Goudarzian AH, Haghdoost AA, Ebadi A, Soleimani MA. An evaluation of psychometric properties of the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale-Extended among a sample of Iranian chemical warfare veterans. Hayat. 2016;22(3):229-44. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity. journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research. 2017;16(3):343-57. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
15. Saber A, Tabatabaei SM, Akasheh G, Sehat M, Zanjani Z, Larijani B. Face and content validity of the MacArthur competence assessment tool for the treatment of Iranian patients. International journal of preventive medicine. 2017;8. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Baghestani AR, Ahmadi F, Tanha A, Meshkat M. Bayesian critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in counseling and Development.2019;52(1):69-73. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development. 2014;47(1):79-86. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV, health. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing. 2007;30(4):459-67. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Salim S, Yamin M, Alwi I, Setiati S. Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of SF-36 quality of life questionnaire on patients with permanent pacemakers. Acta Med Indones. 2017;49(1):6-10. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
20. Darvishpoor A, Abed S, Delavar A, Saeed O. Instrument development to measure elderly health-related quality of life (EHRQoL). Hakim Research Journal. 2012;15(1):30-7. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
21. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Quality of life research. 2005;14(3):875-82. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Kolagari S, Tafreshi MZ, Rassouli M, Kavousi A. Psychometric evaluation of the role strain scale: The Persian version. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2014;16(10). [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Ebadi A, Taghizadeh Z, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. Translation, development and psychometric properties of health related measures-Part 2: construct validity, reliability and responsiveness. journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research. 2017;16(4):445-55. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
24. Nikpour M, Tirgar A, Ghaffari F, Ebadi A, Nia HS, Nasiri-Amiri F. Development and psychometric evaluation of the women shift workers' reproductive health questionnaire: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study. Reproductive Health. 2020;17(1):1-10. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation: Sage publications; 2016. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
26. Nikkhah M, Heravi-Karimooi M, Montazeri A, Rejeh N, Nia HS. Psychometric properties the Iranian version of older People's quality of life questionnaire (OPQOL). Health and quality of life outcomes. 2018;16(1):1-10. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Alimoradi Z, Kariman N, Ahmadi F, Simbar M. Preparation for sexual and reproductive self-care in Iranian adolescent girls: a qualitative study. International journal of adolescent medicine health and quality of life outcomes. 2018;30(1). [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
29. Golzarpour M, GHAEDAMINI H, Vameghi M, Sajjadi H, Tavangar F. Validity and reliability of Persian version of children's health-related quality of life. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical sciences. 2016;8(3):447 59. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30. Drotar D. Measuring health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: Implications for research and practice. 1 ed: Psychology Press; 2014. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31. Sahni S, Talwar A, Khanijo S, Talwar A. Socioeconomic status and its relationship to chronic respiratory disease. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2017;85(2):97-108. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Gephine S, Mucci P, Grosbois J-M, Maltais F, Saey D. Physical Frailty in COPD Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2021;16:1381. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
33. Fadaeeaghdam N, Montazeri A, Masroor D, Aliyari R, Hamidzadeh A. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 2015;33(326):275-86. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
34. Mirshekari N, Vali L. A survey on the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Kerman in 2016. Journal of Military Medicine. 2018;20(4):391-401. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
35. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration policy in mental health mental health services research. 2015;42(5):533-44. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
36. Henoch I, Strang S, Löfdahl C-G, Ekberg-Jansson A. Health-related quality of life in a nationwide cohort of patients with COPD related to other characteristics. European clinical respiratory journal. 2016;3(1):31459. [View at paplisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb