XML Print


1- Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America , eny.dorea@tcu.edu
2- Santa Juliana Hospital, Acre, Brazil
3- Federal University of Acre, Acre, Brazil
4- Federal Fluminense University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract:   (13 Views)
Background: The standards for the care of women and newborns are a collaborative plan of care based on the prioritization of diagnoses, problems, health issues, and mutually established goals, involving the interprofessional team, the patient, their supportive network, or community. Thus, it is crucial to develop a plan of care and implement it in this field to promote the health of women and newborns. This study aims to develop and validate a clinical protocol modeled on the nursing process for implementation in a Normal Birth Center (NBC) in Brazil.
Methods: This methodological study with a qualitative approach was developed in four distinct phases: scoping reviews, qualitative discussions with nurses, and the construction and validation of the protocol.
Results: The scoping review on diagnoses yielded 26 nursing diagnoses. The scoping review on interventions underscored the significance of employing non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief and maternal and neonatal care, highlighting the importance of providing physical and emotional support to women and their babies. The clinical protocol was developed utilizing the minimum nursing dataset, correlating with the 35 evaluated diagnoses in consultations with nurses, and integrating interventions and linkages from NANDA-NIC-NOC. 10 nursing experts validated the protocol.
Conclusion: The clinical protocol will be implemented in an NBC to enhance nursing care for pregnant women and neonates. Additionally, it is anticipated that this study will stimulate the development of new research on the topic, linking various contributions to the field of obstetric nursing and increasing awareness of its value through individualized, targeted diagnoses, interventions, and activities.
     
Type of study: Original Article | Subject: Nursing

References
1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
2. Fong RM, Kaiser JL, Ngoma T, Vian T, Bwalya M, Sakanga VR, et al. Barriers and facilitators to facility-based delivery in rural Zambia: A qualitative study of women's perceptions after implementation of an improved maternity waiting homes intervention. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):e058512. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Gomes SC, Teodoro LPP, Pinto AGA, Oliveira DR de, Quirino G da S, Pinheiro AKB. Rebirth of childbirth: reflections on medicalization of the Brazilian obstetric care. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(5):2594-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Leal MD, Pereira AP, Domingues RM, Theme Filha MM, Dias MA, Nakamura-Pereira M, et al. Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(Suppl 1):S1-16. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Oliveira APC de, Gabriel M, Poz MRD, Dussault G. Challenges for ensuring availability and accessibility to health care services under Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS). Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(4):1165-80. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Alencar AJC, Silva AA, Gonçalves MM, da Silva DMR, Silva MCT. Nursing Care during Humanized Natural Childbirth. Id on Line Rev Mult Psic. 2019;13(47):376-82. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Velho MB, Santos EKA dos, Collaço VS. Natural childbirth and cesarean section: social representations of women who experienced them. Rev Bras Enferm. 2014;67:282-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Secretaria de Planejamento e Investimentos Estratégicos. Objetivos de Desenvolvimento do Milênio: Relatório Nacional de Acompanhamento. Brasília: Ipea: MP, SPI; 2014. [View at Publisher]
9. Rabelo AD. Episiotomia: A dor de um parto. Cad Grad Ciênc Biológicas E Saúde UNIT Sergipe. 2017;4(1):131. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
10. Soares MI, Resck ZMR, Terra F de S, Camelo SHH. Systematization of nursing care: challenges and features to nurses in the care management. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. 2015;19(1). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Resolution COFEN No. 736, January 17, 2024. Establishes the implementation of the Nursing Process within the entire socio-environmental context where nursing care takes place. 2024.
12. Costa RLM. Contribuições da enfermagem obstétrica para uma assistência segura e de qualidade em um hospital público alagoano: um relato de experiência. Gep News. 2017;1(2):25-31. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
13. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Standards for Professional Nursing Practice in the Care of Women, Newborns, and People Across the Life Span, Ninth Edition. Nursing for Women's Health. 2023;27(6):S1-37. [View at Publisher] [DOI]
14. Polit DF, Beck CT. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: avaliação de evidências para a prática da enfermagem. 9th ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2019. p.670. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
15. Medeiros RKS, Júnior MAM, Pinto DPSR, Vitor AF, Santos VEP, Barichello E. Modelo de validação de conteúdo de Pasquali nas pesquisas em Enfermagem. Rev Enferm Referência. 2015;IV(4):127-35. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Sousa BVN, Lima CF da M, Félix NDC de C, Souza F de O. [Benefits and restrictions of systematization of nursing assistance in health management]. J Nurs Health. 2020;10(2):1-13. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Marques DK, Souza GLL de, Silva ABD da, Silva AFD da, Nóbrega MML da. International Nursing Minimum Data Set: a comparative study with tools of a pediatric clinic. Rev Bras Enferm. 2014;67(4):588-93. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Lopes CT. Diagnósticos de Enfermagem da NANDA-I: Definições e Classificação - 2021-2023. 12th ed. Porto Alegre:Artmed;2021. p.568 [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
19. Melo RP, Moreira RP, Fontenele FC, Aguiar ASC de, Joventino ES, Carvalho EC de. Critérios de seleção de experts para estudos de validação de fenômenos de enfermagem. Rev RENE. 2011;12(2):424-31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Jucá LA. Development of a care protocol for a normal birth center: a methodological study. Paiva ED, Santos CL, advisors. Rio Branco (AC): Universidade Federal Fluminense, Escola de Enfermagem Aurora de Afonso Costa; 2022. Portuguese. [master's thesis] [View at Publisher]
22. De Santana WN, Azevêdo JAF, Holanda VR, Gomes ALV, Albuquerque GPM. Plano de parto como instrumento das boas práticas no parto e nascimento: revisão integrativa. Rev Baiana Enferm. 2020;33. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Širvinskienė G, Forray AI, König-Bachmann M, Blaga OM, Grincevičienė Š, Luegmair K, et al. Experiences of childbirth care in Lithuania and Romania: Insights from the European Babies Born Better survey. Birth. 2024;51(1):121-33. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Duarte MR, Alves VH, Rodrigues DP, Souza KV, Pereira AV, Pimentel MM. Care technologies in obstetric nursing: contribution for the delivery and birth. Cogit Enferm Online. 2019;e54164-e54164. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
25. Medeiros AL de, Santos SR dos, Cabral RW de L, Silva JPGN, Nascimento NM de M. Assessing nursing diagnoses and interventions in labour and high-risk pregnancies. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2016;37(3):e55316. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26. Fróes NBM, Lopes MV de O, Pontes CM, Ferreira GL, Aquino P de S. Middle range theory for the nursing diagnosis Excess Fluid Volume in pregnant women. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(suppl 4):e20190334. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Hill CM, Fantasia HC, Burnette S. Implementing a Respectful Maternity Care Guideline During Childbirth Experiences.Nurs Womens Health. 2024;28(1):50-57. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Resolution Conselho Nacional de Saúde (Brasil) No. 466. Guidelines and regulatory standards for research involving human subjects. Brasília (DF): MS; 2012.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb