XML Print


1- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran
3- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Deputy of Nursing, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
5- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman , Rassouli.m@gmail.com
6- Clinical Science and Innovation, City of Hope, Duarte, California, United States of America
Abstract:   (373 Views)
Background: Iran’s health system continues to face challenges in nursing care quality, highlighting the need to improve nursing-sensitive indicators. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of implementing the Magnet Hospital Recognition Program to enhance nursing care quality in six Iranian university-affiliated hospitals.
Methods: An action research design was carried out from 2022 to 2024 in six hospitals selected by predefined inclusion criteria. The study comprised three stages. In stage one, investigators used a validated gap-analysis questionnaire to assess existing nursing service processes across five Magnet dimensions and developed targeted improvement plans. Stage two involved implementing interventions, including specialized training courses, development of a nursing management portal and managerial dashboard, compilation of care indicators, facilitation of advanced qualification licensing for nurses, and establishment of a collaborative research committee with the nursing faculty. In the third stage, program monitoring was conducted through quarterly field visits and progress reports. All data were collected via the gap-analysis tool.
Results: At baseline (Stage one), all centers scored zero in most Magnet dimensions, prompting the design of specific improvement programs. During stage two, organizational overview initiatives empowered managers and updated the nursing management portal. Empirical outcomes advanced through training in the nursing process, pain and wound management, patient satisfaction measurement, and structured patient education and follow-up. Transformational leadership efforts delivered a managerial information dashboard and systematic indicator tracking. Structural empowerment was achieved via professional qualification programs, and innovation was fostered through a joint research committee and human-resource planning. Stage three monitoring revealed that most pilot hospitals had progressed to level 1 (Planning and development) and a minority to level 2 (Full implementation), demonstrating measurable advancement toward Magnet standards.
Conclusion: The Deputy of Nursing’s “Outstanding Hospital” initiative successfully piloted Magnet-based improvements, notably enhancing patient satisfaction and standard adoption. Continued focus on evidence-based practice, professional growth, and the integration of telenursing is recommended for broader implementation.
Full-Text [PDF 496 kb]   (90 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (28 Views)  
Type of study: Original Article | Subject: Nursing

References
1. Nyelisani M, Makhado L, Luhalima T. A professional nurse's understanding of quality nursing care in Limpopo province, South Africa. curationis. 2023;46(1):2322. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Atashzadeh Shoorideh F, Pazargadi M, Zagheri Tafreshi M. The concept of nursing care quality from the perspective of stakeholders: a phenomenological study. J of Qual Res Health Sci. 2012;1(3):214-28. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
3. Danno CH, Esteves LSF, Bohomol E. Quality improvement programs and the professional nursing practice environment: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74(1):e20200108. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Hickey JV, Giardino ER. The role of the nurse in quality improvement and patient safety. Pielęgniarstwo Neurologiczne i Neurochirurgiczne. 2019;8(1):30-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Pires BSM, Oliveira LZFd, Siqueira CL, Feldman LB, Oliveira RA, Gasparino RC. Nurse work environment: comparison between private and public hospitals. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2018;16(4):eAO4322. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Lu H, Zhao Y, While A. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;94:21-31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Endeshaw B. Healthcare service quality-measurement models: a review. Journal of Health Research. 2021;35(2):106-17. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Moayed MS, Khalili R, Ebadi A, Parandeh A. Factors determining the quality of health services provided to COVID-19 patients from the perspective of healthcare providers: Based on the Donabedian model. Front Public Health. 2022;10:967431. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. ANCC. International Information for the Magnet Program 2023. [View at Publisher]
10. Lyle-Edrosolo G, Waxman K. Aligning healthcare safety and quality competencies: quality and safety education for nurses (QSEN), The Joint Commission, and American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) magnet® standards crosswalk. Nurse Leader. 2016;14(1):70-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Gordin P, Fields H. Operationalizing structural empowerment in a Magnet® organization 2020. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
12. Kelly LA, McHugh MD, Aiken LH. Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2011;41(10):428-33. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Stone L, Arneil M, Coventry L, Casey V, Moss S, Cavadino A, et al. Benchmarking nurse outcomes in Australian Magnet® hospitals: cross-sectional survey. BMC nursing. 2019;18:62. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Negarandeh R. Facing nursing shortage: a complex challenge. Hayat. 2015;20(4):1-4. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
15. Ghaleh EA, Farsani SJ, Ariamloo P, Mehrnoosh N, Rassouli M, Ebadi A. Patient education and follow-up units in Iran: A quality improvement project. Nursing Practice Today. 2024;12(1). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Camila L. Empowering Patient Recovery: The Vitality of Hospital Nursing Care. J Nurs Care. 2024;13(1):635-40. [View at Publisher]
17. Alshammari SHS, Alfowais, FA, Al-Mutairi MGA, Aldhafeeri DD, Alshmmri FA, Khdhaier AM. The Effects of Hourly Rounding by Nursing Staff on Patient Safety and Satisfaction: Implications for Clinical Practice and Healthcare Administration. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2024;3(8):9406. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Cornish F, Breton N, Moreno-Tabarez U, Delgado J, Rua M, de-Graft Aikins A, et al. Participatory action research. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2023;3(1):34. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Mohammadi M, Bergh A-M, Jahdi NS, Valizadeh L, Hosseini M, Hakimi S. Launching continuous kangaroo mother care through participatory action research in Iran. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):436. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Ashrafizadeh H, Ebadi A, Rassouli M. The importance of paying attention to the Magnet Hospital project in Iran. Nursing Practice Today. 2024;11(2):89-91. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21. Association AN. Magnet model: Creating a magnet culture. American Nurses Credentialing Center. 2017. [View at paplisher] [Google Scholar]
22. Svensson I, Bridges J, Ellis J, Brady N, Dello S, Hooft J, et al. Laying the foundations for implementing magnet principles in hospitals in Europe: a qualitative analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;154:104754. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Paquay M, Boulanger J-M, Locquet M, Dubois N, Ghuysen A. Exploring the feasibility of the Magnet Hospital concept within a European university nursing department: a mixed-methods study. Contemp Nurse. 2021;57(3-4):187-201. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Urden LD, Baclig JT, Sanchez K. A qualitative exploration of chief nursing officer perspectives on maintaining magnet® designation. J Nurs Adm. 2021;51(10):513-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Maier CB, Gurisch C, Köppen J, Kleine J, Aiken LH. Nurse‐sensitive quality and benchmarking in hospitals striving for Magnet® or Pathway® designation:A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2024. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
26. Abuzied Y, Al-Amer R, Abuzaid M, Somduth S. The magnet recognition program and quality improvement in nursing. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2022;5(4):106-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Hidayah N, Arbianingsih, Ilham. The impact of integrated quality management-based health services on general hospital quality. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1011396. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Mabini Jr SP, Narsico LO, Narsico PG. Service quality, patient satisfaction, and improvement indicators. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 2024;5(4):1331-45. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Askari R, Pishehvaran M, Arabi M. Investigating the Realization of Magnet Hospital Components in Educational Hospitals of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences-Yazd. Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics. 2020;4(3):189-96. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb